Comments on: God’s Battalions: The case for the Crusades http://www.ruminations.co.nz/?p=187 about life, faith and mission Sat, 18 Oct 2014 06:22:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: BJ http://www.ruminations.co.nz/?p=187&cpage=1#comment-47 BJ Wed, 01 Sep 2010 11:15:03 +0000 http://www.ruminations.co.nz/?p=187#comment-47 Hi Wayne. I thought this was an interesting take too. http://www.christiancentury.org/article.lasso?id=8689 Hi Wayne. I thought this was an interesting take too.
http://www.christiancentury.org/article.lasso?id=8689

]]> By: Tim O'Neill http://www.ruminations.co.nz/?p=187&cpage=1#comment-39 Tim O'Neill Fri, 14 May 2010 21:06:52 +0000 http://www.ruminations.co.nz/?p=187#comment-39 "Maybe some of my historian friends could help here?!" Glad to help. While Stark *seems* to make a reasonable historical case and his writing certainly makes his thesis sound plausible, it's actually riddled with errors, omissions and weak arguments and is, ultimately, fatally flawed. For detailed analysis see my review here: http://armariummagnus.blogspot.com/2010/05/gods-battalions-case-for-crusades-by.html “Maybe some of my historian friends could help here?!”

Glad to help. While Stark *seems* to make a reasonable historical case and his writing certainly makes his thesis sound plausible, it’s actually riddled with errors, omissions and weak arguments and is, ultimately, fatally flawed. For detailed analysis see my review here:

http://armariummagnus.blogspot.com/2010/05/gods-battalions-case-for-crusades-by.html

]]>